On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Joe Groff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > EXTEND: nth sequences > : nth ( :my-sequence -- elt ) ... ; > > you could just say: > > EXTEND: nth sequences ( :my-sequence -- elt ) ... ; > > That would require less bookkeeping in the parser, and it's unlikely > you'd use an EXTEND: separate from a definition.
Then you may as well rename EXTEND: to M:, and require it for all method definitions ;-) Slava ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
