It's in the action's config file in /etc/fail2ban/action.d/. These are configurations, so I guess self-documentation is assumed. But like I said, I personally disagree that an action should override that configuration as a basic design decision. By simple count, it is also the exception by far (not counting usages, just action files).
On 01/19/2015 09:50 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015, at 06:41 PM, Lee Clemens wrote: >> That makes sense. Seems like newer actions (ipset, firewalld) are using >> their own bantimes, rather than relying on the jail or the default. >> Seems strange imho that the action should even attempt to override that. > Seems like that would be documented too. > > Obviously I didn't look in the right place or missed it :-( > > Do you know where the docs talk about which actions use which bantime > 'method'? > > Or do you just have to look into each and every action file to figure it out > one by one? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ Fail2ban-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
