It looks like the actions which set bantime were all authored by Daniel Black. Perhaps he could explain why? Or you could certainly submit a PR to remove those overrides.
On 01/19/2015 09:50 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015, at 06:41 PM, Lee Clemens wrote: >> That makes sense. Seems like newer actions (ipset, firewalld) are using >> their own bantimes, rather than relying on the jail or the default. >> Seems strange imho that the action should even attempt to override that. > Seems like that would be documented too. > > Obviously I didn't look in the right place or missed it :-( > > Do you know where the docs talk about which actions use which bantime > 'method'? > > Or do you just have to look into each and every action file to figure it out > one by one? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ Fail2ban-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
