--- In [email protected], "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Much more comments below: > Tom T > > I was infinite mind and I > > was looking at my finite mind and I knew that my finite mind was > >never going to understand what had happened in a million years. That > >is the paradox that is the hallmark of this understanding. Nothing > >has changed and yet everything has changed. > > Vaj > Perfect description of turiyatita/CC ! > > crukstrom wrote: > > When do they become one? > Vaj: > In the Vedantic model, in Brahmi chetana. > > Tom T: > It appears we have a slight communication problem so I will try and > make myself clearer. In my comment above when the lady commented on > her experience of Infinite Mind, she never said she witnessed that she > was Infinite mind. To my understanding witnessing is the primary means > of knowing one is in CC. One witnesses all things happening from an > undisturbed state. She did not say she witnessed, she said quite > clearly and maybe I didn't make it clear that she knew she was > infinite mind. Knowing is not witnessing. Knowing is having them one > in her understanding which seems to fulfill your definition of Brahman > above. She was Infinite mind in which finite mind also existed as part > of her wholeness both being available and both making up the entire > wholeness she is. The understanding this experience is wholeness is a > major criteria of the reality of Brahman. Inside this wholeness > resides all creation. Tom T
This is a good distinction. Knowing is different than thinking. Minds think, something else knows. Rick Carlstrom To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
