very interesting point. This raises an ethical consideration: if one thinks something is truly in everybody's best interest, as MMY and followers thought/think about TM, is it OK to 'market' it, in other words, simplify the message for mass appeal, therefore sacrificing absolute disclosure for what is perceived as the greater good?
Sort of like the quotes from Guru Dev (on Paul Mason's excellent webpage), where Guru Dev talks about latent paratman not serving anyone, much as the latent fire in a piece of wood not warming anyone. Where is the boundary between making something available in its complete context to a select few, vs mass marketing it? --- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Those who appreciate honesty and a repulsion for "spin". Marketing > something as "effortless" to try to make it look like a "higher" form > of meditation is dishonest. Concealing of the truth is not what most > people want when they expect spirituality. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
