--- In [email protected], billy jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
>   So … let me try to restate your referenced argument in simplified 
form – one that even a fecal larvae like me can understand:

FWIW, Vaj's argument is with Tom and with 
Shearer's translation of the Yoga Sutras, not
with anything in my original post (the one you
liked); Vaj completely missed the *context* of
Tom's post (which I had quoted in my post). His
slam at the "many falsehoods" that were 
supposedly in my post was pure obfuscation, as
was his subsequent argument.

(The sutra in question is the last one in
chapter 3 of the Yoga Sutras.)


Reply via email to