--- In [email protected], Bronte Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I DID get that you are saying change is part of perfection, and that from your point of view people can try to make things better and still believe that's everything perfect. But I find that contradictory. <snip> > Added this morning, 9/25: Note that what I've described > just above involves a paradox or an infinite regress. > That's because I'm describing it from the perspective > of duality. As I said at the top, I think from the > perspective of Unity, the free will/determinism conflict > is seen never to have existed in the first place, i.e., > to have been an artifact of duality.
Yep, from the standpoint of dualistic, relative life, multiple problems are seen, and must be solved, as they should be, living a dynamic and responsible life. From the non dual experience of Being though, even the change is seen and embraced as perfect. The union of the one with the many is a profound paradox that is naturally accepted and lived when self realization becomes permanent, and not until. Unity and diversity become indistiguishable from one another. When those who comment on such things write that everything is perfect, the only way a mind embracing duality can comprehend such a statement is in terms of inertia (keep everything as it is, relative to a specific moment), or rationalization (it happened, therefore it is perfect, even though I know damned well it isn't), neither of which is the intended perspective. :-)
