--- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@>
wrote:
> > > Sure, you can become 'part' of the bullshit - and then perhaps
you no
> > > longer see any difference, eh?
> > >
> > Precisely, because when I look closely and intimately at the
bullshit
> > as you call it, it is transformed into divinity. How else to
effect
> > real change in the world, vs. the judgement and condemnation
that
> > others heap upon their objects of perception?
>
>
> Yeah. That's the concept that all the bullshit is 'perfect just as
it
> is' as long as your consciousness 'sees' it as such. It *doesn't*
> however, correct the actual objective adharmic situation - AT ALL.
>
Agreed. Action and hard work is what is needed to ensure the
transformation. A passive acceptance does nothing.:-)
> > As Guru Dev said about
> > the dead dog's brilliant white teeth, there is some entry point
for
> > action in everything we perceive.:-)
>
>
> I'm still waiting to see any 'entry point being put into action' at
> all in the TMO, not to mention the world at large.
>
> All of the TMO nonsense about issuance of currency and global
> governments with governors and a king is like playing out a pretend
> fairy tale - with ZERO connection to what's really happening in the
> world. It's embarrassing to watch adult human beings buy into it.
>
> I don't deny the remarkable positive changes in individuals that
> happen with the practice of TM, but that doesn't match the ongoing
> predominant grandiose TMO rhetoric about objective improvement in
the
> external world - by any stretch of the imagination.
>
Yeah-- I look at the TMO's actions as "the dot zero release". So
there are lots of bugs to be fixed, so to speak. Having said that,
Maharishi had to start somewhere, and the focus now is getting
enough critical mass of enlightened individuals to effect a world
change. Will this happen tomorrow? Hard to say. Better that we
continue on our own self development, than decrying the apparent
lack of objective improvement in our objects of perception. :-)
