--- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As I was told, the meeting between Maharishi and Chopra was 
> very strained. Maharishi was grim and Chopra was insistent. 
> Chopra made his case by saying "I am an intelligent human 
> being and I see that what these people under you are doing 
> is wrong. I can not any longer participate in this without 
> you doing something about it." And Maharishi told him, "I 
> am your master. You will do what I say." Chopra said, "I 
< cannot accept that you refuse to see the reckless behaviour
> of these people." Maharishi repeated, "I am your master. 
> You will do what I say." Chopra looked at him and said, 
> "You are not my master. I am my own master." And he walked 
> out of the room.

I know nothing about Chopra and don't really
want to know any more; he was long after my
time in the TMO, and means nothing to me what-
soever. If this event really took place, more
power to him; I would have done the same thing.

However, the lines attributed to MMY and to
Chopra just might have been lifted from another 
tale, one that I witnessed, in which another of 
Maharishi's students told him that he was "seeing 
someone else" (another teacher), and Maharishi 
told him to stop, using the same phrase. The 
fellow replied using the phrase attributed here 
to Chopra and walked out. At that point MMY
started circulating stories that he had thrown
the offending student out. That was *not* how
it went down.

Maybe they both said it, Chopra and this other
fellow; I don't know. What I do know is that IMO
Maharishi can't hear it too many times. Maybe the 
hundreth time he hears it, it will sink in and he 
will realize that he's living in a different 
century than his students are. 

"Master" is a term with many meanings. One of
the more benevolent ones implies mastery, some-
thing that IMO Maharishi has never demonstrated.
He seems to prefer the meaning that has to do
with slaves' relationship with their owners.

I feel blessed that somehow I escaped the com-
mon tendency in the TMO to consider Maharishi
my "master." He was just a teacher, that's all.
*As* a teacher, IMO he deserved the same degree
of respect I give to any teacher. If the teach-
ings seem good, and of benefit to the *students*, 
I'll respect them; if not, they don't deserve
my respect.



Reply via email to