shempmcgurk wrote: > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> boo_lives wrote: >> >>> --- In [email protected], sgrayatlarge <no_reply@> >>> > wrote: > >>> >>> >>>> www.intentblog.com >>>> >>>> Deepak posts a blog usually two times a week. In the past years >>>> > that > >>>> I have read and commented on Intent, not once did Deepak give >>>> > any > >>>> credit or even mention MMY's name. Plenty of what he says comes >>>> > right > >>>> out of movement dogma; here is more on Intent, take a look, >>>> > make > >>>> comments, most adore Deepak, however, recently I was banned for >>>> > being > >>>> a bit too critical of Chopra. He gets very political and tends >>>> > to > >>>> make unquestioning statements without examples... his gospel. >>>> > His > >>>> previous posts are all listed, have fun! >>>> >>>> >>> All of mov't dogma comes out of certain sects of indian >>> > philosophy, > >>> but MMY-TMO promote it as cognized copyrighted wisdom from "the >>> greatest sage to have ever walked the earth" (the way MMY is now >>> referred to on their global broadcasts). MMY took loads of help >>> > from > >>> the early leaders of the movt in the west who were essential to >>> > making > >>> TM accessible and most of them were dumped unceremoniously. The >>> MMY-Deepak partnership was beneficial to both, and Deepak is >>> > under no > >>> obligation to credit MMY every time he says something about >>> consciousness, in fact as I understand it the TMO lawyers get >>> > upset if > >>> Deepak does mention the mov't in any way. >>> >> So true and you see what happens if you tell some of the folks here >> > that > >> the TM methods are nothing new. I actually enjoyed looking up >> > stuff > >> back in the 70's when I was a teacher to confirm I was teaching >> > some > >> stuff that was somewhat traditional (outside on the no OM thing and >> > the > >> single use of bij mantras). Of course I never mentioned that >> > outside > >> of a circle of teacher friends that did the same thing often >> recommending certain books. Even if I pointed to page 239-240 >> > in "Mind > >> Mysteries" which was published by Swami Sivananda way before MMY >> > even > >> joined the Shankaracharya these people would say it is not the same >> thing as TM though in concept it certainly is. >> > > > > > Great! > > Could you please reproduce the pertinent parts of pp 239-240 right > here for us to look at? > > I thank you in advance for the trouble and attention you will take to > do this task... > Click on Meditation in the Index: http://www.dlshq.org/download/mind.htm
You can just save the page off too and they did and probably still do somewhere have it in a zip file. I thought you already had the file as I've mentioned the book and the link too it here a number of times.
