--- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > <snip> Certainly a large percentage > > > > > of the experiences claimed as "enlightenment" > > > > > by Jim and Rory fall into the category of just > > > > > some overwhelming emotion. <snip> > > > > > > > > Wow-- you nailed it Turq! lol > > > > > > *lol* You crack me up. > > > > Who's 'me'? > > An unreal spewer of non-truth.
Who seems to get away with it in Fairfield. What's up with that, huh? The best I can figure is that after decades of empty TM promises people are so hungry for some sign that enlightenment exists that they'll believe almost anyone who claims to have realized it. Tell me it isn't so, and that he has some phwam! in person, cuz he really doesn't on the Net. It's not an "attacking" thing on my part, as his ego likes to believe, it's just that I don't believe him, and he's uncomfortable with the fact that I don't believe him. If he weren't, and if there weren't a "he" still in there *to* be uncomfortable, why all these endless defenses, eh? Same with Jimbo. The ladies doth protest too much, methinks.
