--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley"
> <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin"
<jflanegi@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB
<no_reply@>
> wrote:
> > > > > <snip> Certainly a large percentage
> > > > > > of the experiences claimed as "enlightenment"
> > > > > > by Jim and Rory fall into the category of just
> > > > > > some overwhelming emotion. <snip>
> > > > >
> > > > > Wow-- you nailed it Turq! lol
> > > >
> > > > *lol* You crack me up.
> > >
> > > Who's 'me'?
> >
> > An unreal spewer of non-truth.
>
> Who seems to get away with it in Fairfield.
> What's up with that, huh?
>
> The best I can figure is that after decades
> of empty TM promises people are so hungry
> for some sign that enlightenment exists that
> they'll believe almost anyone who claims to
> have realized it.
>
> Tell me it isn't so, and that he has some
> phwam! in person, cuz he really doesn't
> on the Net.
>
> It's not an "attacking" thing on my part,
> as his ego likes to believe, it's just that
> I don't believe him, and he's uncomfortable
> with the fact that I don't believe him. If
> he weren't, and if there weren't a "he"
> still in there *to* be uncomfortable,
> why all these endless defenses, eh?
>
> Same with Jimbo. The ladies doth protest
> too much, methinks.
>
oooooooh I am like, sooo threatened by you!!! not protesting dude,
just having a little fun and keeping it REAL...comprende?
