--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oh, goodie. Story time. Tell us the one again about the infinitely
> radiant Pride. Ot the ones where particlees collide in this big
> chamber and go "boom boom"! Or one about dragons. I love the ones
> about dragons! 

LOL.

The one about bombarding all us other "particles"
with His grace to fulfill all our desires and align
our demonic impulses with His angelic harmony is
one of my personal favorites. 


> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> wrote:
> > > What an interesting statement, that of Dark being faster than 
> > > light...that certainly rings true when evaluating the Dark Night 
> > > experience, but how then do we integrate such an experience? 
> > Perhaps 
> > > the Dark Night experience is that of having transcended space time 
> > > intuitively, recognizing that transcendence as Reality, yet still 
> > > hanging on to the now empty husk of false identity? Then after a 
> > > long time of trying to miserably reanimate the false identity of 
> > > concepts and stories, we give up, and gracefully, magically 
> > > integrate ourselves into the Dark, now recognizing how to function 
> > > again in space time, while being true to our Selves.
> > 
> > Yes, nicely put (if I do say so mySelf *lol*); the omnipresent gold-
> > light/angels/deities/etc. would be the subjective (and by that I 
> > mean "real") equivalent of attaining lightspeed and essential 
> > identity with the laws of nature; with further acceleration the 
> > inevitable onset of the Dark if resisted (and it usually is *lol*) 
> > with belief in stories, concepts, etc. brings suffering, as all 
> > resistance = suffering. Kind of like trying to crawl back into the 
> > spacetime womb, resisting one's own birth. But afterwards, we 
> > can "program" the particles and superimpose whatever story of duality 
> > they/we like on the emptiful-indescribable, but without that bind of 
> > identifying belief and consequent resistance, there is no suffering.
> >
>


Reply via email to