Nice story.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <no_reply@>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually, as I recall, perhaps incorrectly, that you wished I would
> > never use your name again.
>
> I replied to your post in which you had said I and others are making
> claims to enlightenment, or higher states of consciousness, or some
> such sweeping inaccuracy. (Again, even several years ago when I had
> said, "I am enlightened," I also added, "and so are you." This has
> always been my thrust here; I have not claimed "enlightenment" as a
> better-than-thou state, as you appeared to imply.) When I responded
> to your "defamation," asking you to leave me out of it -- I can make
> no claims to anything but to having "Died," I believe you replied to
> the effect that I bored you and you didn't particularly wish to
> converse. I said that we were in agreement then, and if you could
> refrain from bringing my name up here again, I could probably refrain
> from boring you further.
>
> >I have tried to honor your wish. I did not
> > realize you perhaps meant I could not post on things that strike my
> > fancy.
>
> I perhaps incorrectly assumed that your not wishing to converse with
> me would actually include your not responding to my posts.
>
> >Particulary since they are non-created by a non-doer.
>
> Do you know how snide this sounds? This is a category error,
> an "advaita shuffle." Within the movie, I exist, I create, I destroy,
> I feel, and I am (sometimes) deadly serious about those who resist
> me, particularly with this type of evasive and snarky dishonesty.
>
> > > Have you changed your policy,
> >
> > Diapers, policies and POVs are meant to be changed.
>
> Feel free to re-open the lines of conversation if and when you decide
> to "get real" about your feelings, instead of using Monist
> slipperiness as an excuse for snide remarks, which are in turn AFAI
> can see apparently an excuse for denied rage. Not too surprising in
> view of your past-stated belief that "Brahman" despite its wholeness
> must somehow exclude the quality of rage :-)
>
> And yes, I *do* realize I am as always only talking to mySelf!
>
> At the moment, I am playing St. George, lovingly spearing a
> particularly slippery dragon-coil of my DNA, a piece that has
> fearfully and hatefully eluded my attention until Now. There's
> the "dragon-story" you asked for!
>
> Nailing me and loving it! :-)
>
> *lol*
>
