No it is not. If you are reduced to claiming that someone "really meant" something quite different from what he actually wrote, there is no possibility of any meaningful discusssion.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:35 PM, feste37 wrote: > > >> The argument isn't over TM > >> and blood pressure, it's (1) how the TMO sees science as just a tool > >> to be manipulated to sell its products and (2) how TBs point to blood > >> pressure study to "prove TM works" really meaning "everything MMY > >> says > >> about anything must be true". > > > > I never said anything remotely resembling this. You invented it > > yourself. It's your fantasy. > > But isn't that really what you meant, feste? Most here would agree > (and have many times in the past) that TM has positive effects on BP-- > it's one of the main reason many of us started. It's the other > ludicrous claims that most rational meditators can't bring themselves > to take seriously. > > Sal >
