On Mar 13, 2008, at 4:30 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2008, at 3:02 PM, endlessrainintoapapercup wrote:
>
> > Vaj, I'm surprised to hear about the grade school science
> > explanation of chemtrails. I've heard for years that
> > investigations of this world wide phenomenon could get no
> > official acknowledgement that it was taking place
There is none. Vaj is, um, exaggerating a bit.
The textbook supposedly talks about possible ways
to stop global warming, one of which is for planes
to use "richer jet fuel." There's nothing about
ongoing experiments or anything similar in what the
guy quotes from the textbook.
The exact same section is actually quoted by an environmental think
tank which acknowledges not only the specific quotes, but their intent
and sources! :
"Rutgers University climate scientist Alan Robock worries that an
aerosol operation could mean "we wouldn't have blue skies anymore."
Our children are now even being taught this aerial obscuration concept
in our schools. In the level one science book, "Essential
Interactions" by Centre Point Learning, Inc., a photo of a jet is
titled "Particle Air" and has the caption "Jet engines running on
richer fuel would add particles to the atmosphere to create a
sunscreen". This is in the section titled "5.19 Case Study: Solutions
for Global Warming". In the same section they also show a picture of a
helicopter dumping iron into the ocean as a way to mitigate global
warming, as we mentioned earlier. Again, CNN actually reported the
iron theory being carried out. These are not just “theories”. Not only
do the governmental studies support this sunscreen theory but there
are also actual patents that have been issued for devices to carry
these operations out. One important patent is the 1994 Welsbach patent
issued to the Hughes Aircraft Co. It is for atmospheric spraying with
aluminum oxide to reduce global warming by “seeding” and reflecting 1%
of incoming sunrays. It so happens that aluminum consistently turns up
in chemtrail related lab test results. Another patent worth mentioning
is the 1975 US Navy patent which is for a “contrail generation
apparatus for producing powder contrails. In the summary section it
clearly states “the term 'contrail' was adopted for convenience in
identifying the visible powder trail". It appears they are still using
the word “contrail” for convenience."
The top of the same article notes:
"At the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the U.S.
government is lobbying for "geoengineering" activities such as
deliberately polluting the stratosphere to deflect sunlight and lower
temperatures. At least nine national governments and the European
Union (EU) have supported experiments to spread iron filings on the
ocean surface to nurture plankton and sequester carbon dioxide. At
least a dozen additional countries are involved in the modification of
stratospheric weather. Commercial carbon traders are engaging in ocean
fertilization as well. This experimentation by governments and
corporations is taking place in the absence of public discussion."
Check it out, see what you think:
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4006
