--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Irmeli Mattsson" 
> > > <Irmeli.Mattsson@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When a politician tells lies and manages to foul up people's
> > > > judgment and gets elected as president, maybe nature wanted
> > > > him to do bad things to test you. You trusted this candidate,
> > > > because he had influential supporters, who affirmed you him
> > > > to be very trustworthy and basically faultless.You voted for
> > > > him, and now you are responsible for the consequences?
> > > > This is what I understand you to be explaining here.
> > > 
> > > Yes, that's one possible scenario, if a rather simplistic
> > > one. But that's the basic idea.
> > > 
> > > The larger point is simply that it's impossible to know
> > > what nature "wants" and why. The consequences and the
> > > "reasons" may be impossibly complex, or might not even
> > > resemble any sort of reasoning humans can grasp, let
> > > alone fitting the human notion of "perfection."
> > 
> > I think the problem here is why people in the TMO 
> > (I've not heard it anywhere else)think "nature" actually
> > *wants* anything.
> 
> It's shorthand, Hugo, not meant literally (that's
> why the scare quotes, don'cha know).
> 
> > What is meant by nature in this context? MMY meant 
> > Will of God when he said natural law. I'm a long
> > way from being convinced that nature needs any
> > sort God. Perhaps the reasons you may think are 
> > complex and beyond our grasp are simply appearing 
> > like this because they don't actually exist.
> 
> Certainly possible. (I've been explaining a
> premise, BTW, not taking a stand on whether it's
> true. I have no way of knowing.)
>

Oh, OK, it's always bugged me about the TMO that's all.
I think people often say it without thinking about 
what it really means, as I used to in fact. Then I sat
down and pondered it, after someone asked me what natural 
law actually meant, and decided the meaning is too huge 
a leap of faith. For me anyway.

Reply via email to