When you said that I'd be gone in 24 hours, you were wrong again.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now comes Dan. Conditions, stipulatons, qualifications, if onlys.
> The world according to Dan, according to Dan, certainly would be a
> nearly ideal world. Dan knows whats best for FFL. It must be
> kindler, gentler. Dialog must be civil. There must be no sarcasm,
> or at least, very mild. Dan will know which is which. Dan to carry
> the banner. "Dan is great in 08" I say he's gone in 24 hours.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002"
> <danfriedman2002@> wrote:
> >
> > I'll post the research, if you want to be openminded
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tertonzeno" <tertonzeno@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --Right. Most succintly, there have been no clear testimonials
> of
> > > first hand GC (embracing Celestial/Glorified) levels of
> awareness;
> > > and how this is to be distinguished from CC.
> > > Also, the accounts of "witnessing" during sleep are
suspiciously
> > > fleeting and sporadic.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
<jpgillam@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jun 20, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002"
> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> TM requires practice for the development of full
> benefits.
> > > Going
> > > > > >> from 'boat to boat' will not get the seeker to the other
> > shore.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I understand Fairfield has a few score people who
> > > > > > qualify as fully enlightened. If that's true, how
> > > > > > many woke up after abandoning TM for something else?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think there are signs that people are beginning
> > > > > to awaken in FF and
> > > > > other places and some are just having nice
> > > > > meditative experiences--
> > > > > common ones which are often mistaken for
> > > > > Enlightenment. But I have
> > > > > not heard of anyone who meets the criteria
> > > > > of "CC" as Maharishi
> > > > > Mahesh Yogi described it, so I think your
> > > > > claim of "full
> > > > > enlightenment" is a tad premature.
> > > >
> > > > I'm talking about unity consciousness. I
> > > > understood there were people in Fairfield
> > > > claiming unity consciousness. That's what
> > > > I'm asking to confirm, deny or elaborate upon.
> > > >
> > > > > In many
> > > > > ways it seems a typical neoadvaita scene.
> > > >
> > > > Please elaborate - I don't get a mental
> > > > image of what a neoadvaita scene would be,
> > > > for all the use of that term here.
> > > >
> > > > > It seems many of these people did begin to have good
> > experiences
> > > > > after leaving the movement, some with other meditation
> > > techniques,
> > > > > some remaining with TM and/or the TMSP.
> > > >
> > > > Such may be the case, but I'm questioning
> > > > whether there are people in Fairfield who
> > > > reached enlightenment after switching paths.
> > > > Dan Friedman says it isn't done, but I somehow
> > > > got the impression it had been done.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
