"If you feel you need a more personal expression, please do
not hesitate to contact me and share your grievance."

This self-serving advertisement is unworthy of a former TM Governor.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John M. Knapp, LMSW" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, TurquoiseB, for your extremely kind words. I'll try to live 
up to them!
> 
> Thanks, also for your story about Rachel. Yeah, I can see myself in 
that story -- both the 
> hurtful side and the changed side.
> 
> My journey toward change *began* in leaving TM. I sought out exit 
counseling from Janja 
> Lalich and Margaret Singer in 1995-96. I offer them so many thanks. 
More than I can say.
> 
> But in all honesty, their exit counseling had limited effect on me. 
It got me out of TM, and I 
> did finally stay out of TM after 3 previous tries to leave it.
> 
> But I remained one screwed up puppy. Not only did I remain enraged 
and acting out on 
> AMT -- I even turned on these two people who tried to help me. I've 
apologized to Janja, 
> who graciously accepted my attempt to make amends. Unfortunately, 
Margaret died 
> before I could talk with her. That's a lesson I take to heart. I 
try to make amends now as 
> soon as I can. Life's too short and unexpected to waste any time.
> 
> When I really started to reflect on my shit was when I entered 
therapy. It may not be for 
> everyone, but it definitely did some good for me.
> 
> And, just as you surmise, professionally entering the helping 
professions in 1998 (as a 
> personal aide to autistic and developmentally challenged people) 
really turned my head 
> around.
> 
> I haven't arrived. I still struggle mightily with nasty personal 
challenges, such as 
> narcissism. And I still act out from time to time.
> 
> But I believe I have the tools to reflect on my feelings, thoughts, 
actions, beliefs and make 
> headway.
> 
> I'll never be perfect. Perfection is a process, not a destination, 
to my way of thinking.
> 
> But as I wrote recently: I'm busy becoming the man my teen-aged 
self would have been 
> proud of. And, finally at age 55, I see light at the end of that 
particular tunnel.
> 
> In that spirit, I offer the individuals and the community that I 
may have harmed in the past 
> a sincere apology. If you feel you need a more personal expression, 
please do not hesitate 
> to contact me and share your grievance.
> 
> Thanks again, TurquoiseB, for a chance to talk at some length on 
these matters.
> 
> J.
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not on a spiritual path, which is a meaningless phrase. 
> > > You're pretending to be all nicey-nice but I don't believe 
> > > a word of it. 
> > 
> > This speaks to your limitations, feste, not John's.
> > 
> > I had a good friend in the Rama trip who was a real
> > ball-busting bitch. She had the rep of having made
> > *every person* in the companies she worked with cry
> > as a result of her heartless treatment of them.
> > 
> > Then she caught a clue and bailed from the Rama trip
> > and, over time, found that she needed something new
> > in her life. So she went back to school and became
> > a psychologist, and began to practice at it. I saw
> > her again a few years later and the change in her
> > was truly amazing. Almost all of the "rough edges"
> > had been polished off of her; she was in danger of
> > being a truly balanced and wonderful human being.
> > She attributed the change (which she was more than
> > aware of, too) to having forced herself into a 
> > position in which she *had* to become compassionate
> > and caring, as part of her *job description*. Work-
> > ing with people who had come to her for help had
> > forced her to *put aside* her own samskaras and
> > focus on helping them with theirs.
> > 
> > I'm betting that you have never placed yourself in
> > such a position, feste, and that neither has Lawson 
> > or Judy. It shows.
> > 
> > I, for one, notice rather a change in the way that
> > John handles himself lately, compared to how he
> > used to. That shows, too. He refuses to be baited 
> > into replying angrily and with malice, even when 
> > taunted by those who clearly mean him harm. Like 
> > Curtis, he tries to find a "middle way" whereby he 
> > can remain true to his own beliefs while not 
> > discounting or (more important) discrediting 
> > the beliefs of others. 
> > 
> > In short, I see John as Having Made Progress. And
> > at the same time, I see the "on the program TMers"
> > here who are giving him a hard time as having made
> > none whatsoever. They are still stuck in the same
> > reactivity and anger that they were when I first
> > encountered them years ago. They still react by
> > distrusting *anything* a TM critic says and by
> > demonizing the critic. John doesn't.
> > 
> > IMO, that kinda indicates that whatever John is
> > doing *works*, and that whatever these TMers are
> > doing *doesn't*. He's changing, in what most would
> > consider a positive way, and his tormentors are not.
> > 
> > John, if you're still reading this thread, I wonder
> > if you can comment on what might have precipitated
> > this change. My bet is that it's the same phenom-
> > enon I saw in my friend Rachel. The very *process*
> > of practicing a profession that *requires* that
> > you transcend your samskaras to help others allows 
> > you to better transcend them.
> > 
> > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John M. Knapp, LMSW"
> > > <jmknapp53@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> 
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You're being deliberately obtuse. People who claim they 
were lied to
> > > > > again and again are playing the victim. Maharishi didn't 
lie to you.
> > > > > He gave you a wonderful technique for spiritual growth. It 
was
> > you who
> > > > > lacked understanding -- and then you betrayed the person 
who had
> > > > > helped you. Shame.  
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > I think it's too bad that you label people who disagree with 
you as
> > > obtuse -- or any other 
> > > > hurtful label.
> > > > 
> > > > I gave my definition of victimization. Your differs.
> > > > 
> > > > Mine works for me. I'm sure yours works for you.
> > > > 
> > > > I believe the Maharishi lied to me -- and to others.  You 
don't.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > See? We can disagree without hurtfulness.
> > > > 
> > > > I expect no less from someone following a spiritual path.
> > > > 
> > > > J.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to