This message was not intended for you, Dan. I was replying to feste37.
J. --- In [email protected], "danfriedman2002" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I'm "Still reading and responding". I was told theis was some > kind of Wild West Fantasy World, couldn't resist the fight. BTY, you > bad guy gunslingers forgot to load up. Bring on a few more so we can > make it a fair fight (or come up to Harlem) or the Middle East to get > real. > > To answer your question: "I'm loving it" Thanks for the fun, punks. > > > --- In [email protected], "John M. Knapp, LMSW" > <jmknapp53@> wrote: > > > > Still reading and responding, I see. > > > > Are you content with your spiritual life -- and other aspects of > your life? > > > > J. > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > > > Your problem, Knapp, is that you have zero integrity, as your > website > > > demonstrates. End of conversation. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "John M. Knapp, LMSW" > > > <jmknapp53@> wrote: > > > > > > > > More "spiritual" name calling, feste37. > > > > > > > > I am very content in my spiritual life and other aspects of my > life. > > > > > > > > Are you content in yours? > > > > > > > > I gotta tell you, your posts come across as angry, unhappy, > fearful. > > > > > > > > Naturally, I have as much right as anyone to post here. > > > > > > > > If you don't like what I write, there's no need to read my > posts. > > > > > > > > Much less respond to them. > > > > > > > > Why do you continue to do so? > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'm not answering your questions because I am not going to > play your > > > > > silly games. The idea of you being a part of the TM movement > again is > > > > > a joke. You are a chronic malcontent. No one would want you. > Go away. > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "John M. Knapp, LMSW" > > > > > <jmknapp53@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please stop trying to "therapize" me. I am immune to it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your claim to want to reform the TM movement is > ridiculous. > > > You are > > > > > > > not in the TM movement, so how can you reform it? Why > should > > > anyone > > > > > > > take any notice of you? You chose to leave, so stick to > your > > > decision. > > > > > > > In any case, I can't imagine that anyone would ever trust > you > > > again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No one's trying to "therapize" you. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm glad you are immune to it -- whatever that is. > > > > > > > > > > > > I do note, however, you chose not to answer any of my > questions. > > > > > Some might take that as > > > > > > a position of weakness. > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not have to be part of the TM Movement to want to > reform it. In > > > > > some regards, I will > > > > > > always be a TM teacher. It was part of me for a very long > time. It > > > > > still is. > > > > > > > > > > > > Many former Catholics are active in reform organizations. > Many > > > > > expatriates are eager to > > > > > > reform the policies of the US -- particularly the current > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't in any way seem like a paradox to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Leaving" the TM Movement is not a black/white thing, > either. I > > > > > would like to be proud of > > > > > > the Movement again. If it were to become accountable as a > spiritual > > > > > organization in the > > > > > > ways I outlined, I could imagine wanting to be associated > with > > > it again. > > > > > > > > > > > > Some people *don't* trust me. That much is evident. > > > > > > > > > > > > But many do! I make my living and follow my career, which > is based > > > > > on trust. > > > > > > > > > > > > It appears difficult for you to imagine people trust me. > > > > > > > > > > > > What does it feel like to know so many disagree with your > position? > > > > > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
