--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > This message might invite more scrutiny by the CIA of TMO's > > > > intentions aside from spreading vedic knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > It mighta also invite the scrutiny of the IRS. > > > > > > Aren't some churches getting their tax-exempt status reviewed > because > > > they've been playing politics as of late? > > > > > > > TMO isn't a registered church. > > > > Of course it isn't. > > But it does have tax-exempt status...and my invoking churches wasn't > because they were churches per se but because churches also have tax- > exempt status. > > Lobbying groups are not tax exempt. > >
A congratulatory notice isn't lobbying. Stupid perhaps. Offensive perhaps. Lobbying, no. Lawson
