--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > > Amma is regarded as an Avatar by many though not by me, for others She > > is Godhead herself. Others again regard Her as a cherished Teacher. > I visited Amma's ashram in Amritpuri during my tour of India. That is > the only time I ever met her. When I returned home I looked up some the > organization's documents on the Internet and they speak of her as being > a "Devi Bhava". Bhava means "house" so what it means is she channels > that energy but is not the devi energy incarnate. Some of her followers > believe the latter but they must not have read any of the organization's > docs. Frankly most people her could be considered "Devi Bhavas" of > Saraswati because at some point of practice that energy overtakes you > and influences most of your actions and speech unless you are dealing > with mundane matters. This of course is a "belief" and some won't > believe and other may.
Well taken ! Exactly my point also nooz. Whatever Her students believe of Her is alright with me. But when one of Her students starts to "teach" meditations in Her name, without Her authorization, as Rich Archer does, then it's an important cosmic mistake. IMHO.
