On Sep 22, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Sep 22, 2008, at 7:56 AM, feste37 wrote:
Banning someone for 3 weeks for the "offense" of posting 5 over the
limit is excessive. It's overkill. I think that a ban, if you must
ban
people, of one week would be sufficient. Also, drop the judicial
language of "3rd offense." What are you, the police?
--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3rd offense Lawson. I'm afraid this time you're out for three weeks.
We'll miss you. Toodles.
Rick, I agree, 3 weeks is too much. Why not either 1 week
for all offenses, or one week for the first and then 2 weeks
thereafter? The first way would be easiest for you, as you
wouldn't have to remember which "offense" the poster was
on. Just a thought.
What about "three strikes and you're out"?
