Very nice decision. You picked up on the prevailing sentiment, and made a quick decision. It's encouraging when things resolve themselves in a common sense way, without prolonged and agonizing debate.
--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of off_world_beings > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 11:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count > > > > I think banning someone for one week, each time they go over the 50 is fine. > So in Shemps case, for example, he'll likely get one week on, and one week > off. Fair enough. He's obsessive-compulsive, so that is just enough to help > him with his disorder, but not enough to be Draconian towards such > weakenesses. > > We should take this compassionate approach towards such diseased minds. It > is not entirely their fault. We must take a collective responsiblity for the > shortcomings of any one of us, no matter how distasteful and repugnant that > may feel to you all. > > OK. Enough people have voted in favor of the 1-week ban. I'll make that the > policy. Lawson will be back in a week. >
