--- In [email protected], Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], Peter Sutphen > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > --- Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Per this framwork, if a gyani had some odd > > sexual > > > > and business karma, the unfoldment of such > > could look bizarre to > > > > onlookers. But it is not > > > > > volitional nor stemming from unresolved > > vasanas > > > > needs). its "taking it > > > > > (Prarabdha karma) as it comes." > > > > > > > > So this means that a gyani's karma(action) in a > > > > previous life led > > > > him to a place in a present life where he had to > > > > fuck someone and he > > > > could not say no? Hoo boy, that's a good one. > > > > > > > > Rick Carlstrom > > > > > > I used to bang a lot of hot chicks on long TM > > courses > > > with that line. It's not me baby, but a kinky > > > past life. What can I do? Now shut-up and take > your > > > clothes off. > > > > Yes, you were undoubtedly quite the stud, and we are > > quite impressed. > > However just because you immaturely and > > manipulatively (that seems to > > be your acknowledgment, not a judgment) used such > > a line, does not > > negate that many or most sexual liaisons are indeed > > something started > > in past lives. > > > > While you may disagree, and hold that each and every > > relationship is > > new, fresh and has nothing to do with karma. What > > are your views on > > the questions in this adjacent post: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/58042 > > Well, my post was obviously facetious.
Oh, ok. It was not so obvious -- though it seemed a bit out of character for you. So I take it back: you are not a stud, and we are not impressed. :) Given the apparent depth of the six-naked breast vasana, your fantasy/mock course bed hopping story seemed plausible. > I don't really > think alot about karma because it is quite complex. Same with most people it appears. Which is natural, I just find it amusing when those who have little knowledge or appreciation of it imply that it is silly -- al la Ricks post -- and my original take on your post. While it may be hogwash, coming to that conclusion should at least include some knowledge of its theory and application. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
