--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well. I have been some time in the TMO, so most of what I know is 
> from MMY - and what he says about Householder Mantras and the 
balance 
> between silence and activity. So what you are saying is new for me 
> and interesting. 
> Ingegerd

MMY quite openly acknowledges that the idea of householder vs recluse 
mantras is unusual. It is THE central point of his commentary of the 
Gita.

> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > Inge, there are no householder mantras and no recluse mantras. 
> These are TMO ideas. There are Shaiva mantras and Shakta mantras.
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: Ingegerd 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 12:35 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
> > 
> > 
> > I find it real peculiar that with the Householders Mantras, 
people 
> > try to live in celebacy and be a recluse. It does not make sense 
to 
> > me. If you meditate with a Householders Mantra, then you should 
be 
> > very active in society, otherwise it will cause stress. In the 
> > earlier days young people were practising Transcendental 
Meditation 
> > for hours, dreaming of some life as a recluse in Himalayas. I 
knew 
> > some of them - and some got very heavy mental problems and some 
did 
> > suicide. We were not told the difference between Householders 
> Mantras 
> > and Mantras given for recluse life. The fact is that we were not 
> told 
> > anything at all. In 1962, I got the Mantra one day, and the 
teacher 
> > checked the mantra the day after and then left. The next time I 
saw 
> > her, was 20 years after. But most of us continued to meditate. 
That 
> > was the days where we were allowed to practice long meditations -
>  .I 
> > once meditated in 12 hours - and came out quite dizzy, it was 
> rather 
> > dangerous. So in the beginning of the Movement it seems that MMY 
> and 
> > we were learning by doing. "The strongest survived."
> > Ingegerd
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > > Llundrub wrote:
> > > 
> > > >Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >on 6/20/05 10:05 AM, Llundrub at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  Yes, just OM! 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >So I wonder whether meditating on OM by itself might make one 
a 
> > recluse while meditating with a longer mantra that contains OM 
> might 
> > not, as my friend suggested in the comment I posted here 
yesterday. 
> > > >
> > > >I have a basic problem with these generalizations based on 
> > heresay.  
> > > >
> > > >For the basic reason that when I used to do TM at MIU I wanted 
> to 
> > be a recluse and escape from all the cares of the world, and that 
> was 
> > using my non-OM mantra. So I can only imagine if what Maharishi 
> says 
> > about OM is true that I would have probably wanted to run 
screaming 
> > from samsara. Moreover, my desires had no support at MIU and I 
was 
> > miserable.   
> > > >
> > > >So I ask, what is the real difference?  
> > > >
> > > >My experience, which I consider to be the only important thing 
> in 
> > the world, confirms for me that the mantras which I have used 
since 
> > TM, most of which contain OM as a part are extremely effective in 
> > very vaulable ways, and they have only bettered my life.  
> > > >
> > > >When I used to do Mahalakshmi Sadhana I used two main mantras 
> > which together are:
> > > >Om shrim klim mahalakshmiyei namaha Om shrim hrim shrim kamala 
> > kamalalayei praseed praseed shrim hrim shrim om mahalakshmiyei 
> > namaha.  Many Oms, I had much benefit from doing this 250,000 
> times. 
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > <snip>
> > > If you have a "guru mantra" then the amount of repetitions 
> required 
> > to 
> > > attain mantra siddhi are significantly reduced.  It's also 
> > interesting 
> > > to note that the "secret" mantras are often much shorter. :)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Or go to: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > and click 'Join This Group!' 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ------------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> >   a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> >   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> >     
> >   b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     
> >   c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
> Service.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to