No one's been doing their asanas regularly! Very nice
post. The flow of consciousness as overwhelming love
to a point in the relative. The "stitching" of the
relative into the Absolute.

--- Robert Gimbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ---Also, in rising to GC the inner knower begins to
> feel expanding 
> love, or whatever you want to call it; but a feeling
> of flow from 
> infinity inside to any point outside. This relates
> to omniscience in 
> that the flow of this inner field of awareness,
> spontaneously, knows 
> or is drawn to the particular point of interest. 
> Really in any situation of lack; it is lack of love,
> lack of 
> passion, and now, when pure consiousness is
> established, and all ego 
> based fear dissolved, there's nothing left to do,
> but "watch" the 
> absolute "move"...
> 
> 
>  In [email protected], "Robert Gimbel"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > -Before enlightenment, the world we perceive is
> "of, by and for 
> the 
> > ego. Everything is seen and translated in terms of
> this point, 
> this 
> > sense of me(the ego). 
> > After enlightenment is acheived one steps out of
> identifying with 
> > this point, this sense of me(the ego). 
> >   One is no longer indentified with a point, this
> tiny sense of me
> > (the ego), but becomes identified with the origin
> of any point in 
> > pure awareness, the Absolute.
> > One can become aware of any point,any side of any
> issue; no longer 
> > guided by a single perspective(ego based), totally
> limiting view...
> > So, the next step is allowing the pure
> consciousness to "flow 
> within 
> > itself to the point, then to the next point, all
> point guided now, 
> > not by ego, but by pure intelligence. Any
> "problem" is seen as 
> just 
> > energy, which needs balance and recieves balance
> spontaneously, 
> from 
> > point to point. 
> > In other words, an enlightened person, detatched
> perceives from 
> the 
> > state of being, and in that silence, brings forth
> the opposite 
> > energy to perfectly balance, thereby always,
> percieving the Unity, 
> > in diversity; as being established in pure
> consiousness, silence, 
> > always provides the Unifying factor, always...
> > 
> > 
> > -- In [email protected], "claudiouk"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > Many thanks for all the responses, not sure how
> to address them 
> > all.. 
> > > They helped me think more about the question and
> hopefully some 
> > > resolution is taking place somewhere in my
> brain....
> > > 
> > > 58385... Irmeli Mattsson
> > > 
> > > > "I cannot understand how this kind of
> theoretical, 
> intellectual 
> > > speculation can help a person to evolve... If
> you have a rigid 
> > > preconceived idea, you are less open for the
> > > unexpected, which a new stage will be. "
> > > 
> > > MMY often emphasized the importance of
> understanding along with 
> > > direct experience, for one's evolution. I agree
> that "imitating" 
> a 
> > > state of consciousness from some cultural
> transmission is 
> > pointless, 
> > > but theoretical discussions can hopefully reduce
> confusion and 
> be 
> > > inspiring and motivating. I imagine that direct
> experience would 
> > > override and automatically stretch any limiting 
> preconceptions.
> > > 
> > > > "Every thought and every experience regardless
> of how .. 
> > > transcendental it feels, when perceived in and
> through a 
> physical 
> > > body and nervous system, is always in the
> relative. We can only 
> > talk 
> > > about the absolute, we cannot experience it."
> > > 
> > > In MMY's schema, this is the "point to infinity"
> bit, only 
> you're 
> > > saying that any and all experience is relative.
> But the Knower 
> is 
> > > Absolute so from the "infinity to point"
> perspective why are we 
> > stuck 
> > > with the relative experience associated with
> THIS point body and 
> > not 
> > > others, given that the Knower inhabits other
> bodies 
> > simultaneously. 
> > > 
> > > 58396 ... Rory Goff
> > > 
> > > >"Brahman" or Wholeness resides AS fully in the
> "manifest,
> > > relative" point as in the "unmanifest, absolute"
> Ocean. No
> > > difference. A natural progression from this
> would seem to be the
> > > realization that one's Wholeness is potentially
> as free to be ANY
> > > point-self as to be one's habitual point-self:"
> > > 
> > > Yes Infinity (= Wholeness = Unmanifest/Absolute
> = Self) is 
> > > omnipresent at every Point (= manifest, relative
> = self). So why 
> > is 
> > > the consciosness/Knower remain linked to the
> habitual point self 
> > if 
> > > it is free to be ANY point-self ?
> > > 
> > > 58405...  jim_flanegin 
> > > 
> > > > "The Self is distinctly free from any sense of
> personal 
> > > identification.It is perceived by the original
> 'point' body, but 
> > is 
> > > not actually connected to it.....It is odd
> because it feels like 
> > me, 
> > > but try as I might I can't locate the attachment
> point, through 
> > > thought or the senses."
> > > 
> > > Yes  identification dissolves when going from
> point to infinity.
> > > 
> > > > "Though I am unsure about the next step- how
> the perception of 
> > the 
> > > Self begins to extend to everything else 'out
> there'. 
> > Conceptually, 
> > > yes, but experientially, not yet constant."
> > > 
> > > This infinity to pointS is the tricky bit. I
> myself can't speak 
> > from 
> > > experience, but am interested in it conceptually
> (as part of 
> some 
> > > understanding of the possibilities of higher
> states of 
> > > consciousness). Not sure for instance how it
> relates to "Unity".
> > > 
> > > 58408 ... Llundrub
> > > 
> > > > "This is the problem, identifying with the
> body as if it's a 
> > point. 
> > > The body is infinite. The self is absolute, not
> infinite. A 
> point 
> > of 
> > > identification is the absolute identifying with
> some snapshot of 
> > the 
> > > infinite. There are no points. There are merely
> snapshots."
> > > 
> > > I like MMY's spacial schema "point to infinity"
> = 
=== message truncated ===



                
____________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to