I suspect what RP is talking about when he mentions technology is the
liquefaction of coal. Coal can be turned into a liquid.

http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2005/07/about_coal_liqu.html
<http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2005/07/about_coal_liqu.html>


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Lol...Idiot republicans ACTUALLY THINK this is bad for Obama !
> The
> > coal industry is already doing what Obama suggested here. Even they
> are
> > moving into greener technologies with zero emmissions plants. Its
> as if
> > they are in lock step together in their vision for the future with
> > Obama, and the people in those States are well aware of that.
> > Its only idiots like you and the other republicans, that the coal
> > industry has already left behind, are still part of the old school
> > dustbin of history.
> >
> > OffWorld
>
>
> I guess I'm an idiot along with RON PAUL, your hero!
>
> Ha!
>
> Here's what Paul has to say about coal:
>
> What role do you think coal should play in America's energy future?
> "Coal is a source of energy, and it should be used, but it has to be
> used without ever hurting anybody. I think we're smart enough to do
> it. Technology is improving all the time. If oil goes to $150 a
> barrel because we've bombed Iran, coal might be something that we can
> become more independent with. I think technology is super, and we are
> capable of knowing how to use coal without polluting other people's
> property."
>
> Paul is also against a carbon tax, so what Obama says about coal is
> in direct opposition to Paul's stance.
>
>
>
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , "shempmcgurk"
> <shempmcgurk@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > http://tinyurl.com/68oyz4 <http://tinyurl.com/68oyz4>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hidden Audio: Obama Tells SF Chronicle He Will Bankrupt Coal
> Industry
> > >
> > >
> > > By P.J. Gladnick (Bio | Archive)
> > > November 2, 2008 - 07:26 ET
> > >
> > > (Please read update about the San Francisco Chronicle neglecting
> to
> > > mention Obama's willingness to bankrupt the coal industry at
> bottom
> > > of this blog.)
> > > Imagine if John McCain had whispered somewhere that he was
> willing to
> > > bankrupt a major industry? Would this declaration not immediately
> be
> > > front page news? Well, Barack Obama actually flat out told the San
> > > Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal
> > > industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview. The result?
> > > Nothing. This audio interview has been hidden from the
> public...until
> > > now. Here is the transcript of Obama's statement about bankrupting
> > > the coal industry (emphasis mine):
> > >
> > > Let me sort of describe my overall policy.
> > >
> > > What I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in
> place
> > > that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's
> > > out there.
> > >
> > > I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade
> > > system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases
> > > emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a
> market
> > > in which whatever technologies are out there that are being
> > > presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they
> > > would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted
> down
> > > caps that are being placed, imposed every year.
> > >
> > > So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's
> > > just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be
> charged a
> > > huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.
> > >
> > > Story Continues Below Ad «
> > >
> > > That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in
> > > solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.
> > >
> > > The only thing I've said with respect to coal, I haven't been some
> > > coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the
> > > table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if
> > > technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue
> it.
> > >
> > > So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.
> > >
> > > It's just that it will bankrupt them.
> > > Amazing that this statement by Obama about bankrupting the coal
> > > industry has been kept under wraps until this time.
> > >
> > > UPDATE: NewsBusters' Tom Blumer has found out that the San
> Francisco
> > > Chronicle story published on January 18 based upon this January 17
> > > interview did not include any mention of Obama's willingness to
> > > bankrupt the coal industry which you can hear on the audio. You
> can
> > > read the story here when you scroll down to the "In His Own Words"
> > > section. Way to cover up for The One, SF Chronicle!
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to