--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Richard M" <compost1uk@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" > <do.rflex@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine > > > > > <salsunshine@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Maharishi Peace Palaces are looking to fill an > > > > > Accommodation > > > > > > > > > > manager/marketing position.This is a full-time > > position but > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > flexible to > > > > > > > > > > allow for one to participate in the Invincible > America > > > > > > > Assembly. > > > > > > > > > > Hours would > > > > > > > > > > be 1:00 - 4:30 and 8:00 - 9:00 6 days a week. > > > > > Qualifications > > > > > > > include > > > > > > > > > > experience in sales, marketing, financial > management, > > good > > > > > > > self - > > > > > > > > > > organizer > > > > > > > > > > with computer skills and customer service oriented > manner. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~Remuneration would be accommodation in one bedroom > of > > the > > > > > > > Maharishi > > > > > > > > > > Peace > > > > > > > > > > Palace > > > > > > > > > > ~$500 basic plus 4% of gross accommodation income > per > > month > > > > > > > > > > ~Opportunity to enjoy a further $700 per month > exits as > > > > > hours > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > been set > > > > > > > > > > to accommodate the Invincible America Assembly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To set up an interview please send resumes to us at > > > > > tmcenter@ > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:tmcenter@> . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone want to write up a "resume" and send it in? :) > > > > > > > > > D > > > > > > > > > Sal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below poverty wages. That doesn't remotely meet the > minimum > > > > > wage. > > > > > > > > Illegal immigrants make more. What a joke. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not a defense of the TMO in this instance, Bongo > > Brazil, > > > > > but > > > > > > > you're wrong when you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "That doesn't remotely meet the minimum wage." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, actually, it does: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assume 30 days in a month, less 4 days off = 26 working > days. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 26 working days times 4.5 hours of work a day = 117 hours > total > > > > > work > > > > > > > per month. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 117 hours times the future minimum wage (effective July > 24, > > 2009) > > > > > of > > > > > > > $7.25/hour = $848.25 mimimum wage for the month. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $848.25 less the $500.00 minimum they pay you = $348.25 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...and what is the reasonable market value of a room > rented for > > > > > one > > > > > > > month in the Peaceful Palate? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know what the rental market is in Iowa but, gosh, > I'd > > > > > LOVE to > > > > > > > pay less than $12.00 a day (which is what $348.25 divided > by 30 > > > > > days > > > > > > > equals) for a room! The last hotel room I stayed in (in > > > > > Baltimore at > > > > > > > the Sheridan) was $200 a day! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And we haven't even factored in the 4% on top of > everything > > they > > > > > will > > > > > > > pay you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, I'm not a fan of the TMO or its slave-labor > policies but > > > > > it is > > > > > > > certainly not what you suggest it is, Bongo. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's a total crap deal, Magoo, and you know it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you not read English? > > > > > > > > > > Are your reading skills as bad as your political positions? > > > > > > > > > > Read what I wrote above: "...its slave-labor policies" > and "I'm > > not a > > > > > fan of the TMO..." and "This is not a defense of the TMO". > > > > > > > > > > Of course it's a total crap deal, as I made QUITE clear. > > > > > > > > > > The issue was your shouting your mouth off by saying things > that > > you > > > > > obviously don't think through. > > > > > > > > > > See if you can limit your comments to that and not try and > > divert it > > > > > to something that we obviously agree on. > > > > > > > > > > Can't you proffer a simple "I stand corrected"? Is that so > hard > > for > > > > > you to do? > > > > > > > > > > > > On the minimum wage, I stand corrected. But with what's left of > the > > > > economy and jobs after the fine work of your selfish, greedy > > > > free-market deregulate-the-industry pals in the financial > sector it > > > > just might be the only thing available for someone with the > skills > > > > mentioned above. > > > > > > > > Now let's see you proffer a simple "I stand corrected" with > regard to > > > > legitimate global warming science and the fraudulent 'experts' > you put > > > > forward to deny its causes. > > > > > > How silly. > > > > > > In my imagination I see you locked in a room with e.g. Professor > > > Richard S Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, > > > Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT. > > > > > > How will you make your case for "fraudulent expert" in those > > > circumstances? I suspect the conversation will be a bit one-sided. > > > > > > (I am not saying that Lindzen is right - just that you are > ignorant to > > > think/assert that climate change scepticism is "fraudulent") > > > > > > Expressing skepticism isn't fraudulent, but stating faulty opinions > > and bogus claims as fact is. None of the skeptics have debunked the > > overwhelming globally recognized peer-reviewed scientific body of > > evidence and global consensus on its basis that global warming and > its > > causes are real. > > > > > Yes, they have...time and time and time again. > > Tell you what, Bongo: you cite the "overwhelming globally recognized > peer-reviewed scientific body of evidence" you refer to above and > I'll provide the debunking.
I stand by my statement: "Expressing skepticism isn't fraudulent, but stating faulty opinions and bogus claims as fact is. None of the skeptics have debunked the overwhelming globally recognized peer-reviewed scientific body of evidence and global consensus on its basis that global warming and its causes are real." The challenge is yours Magoo. So far you've shown nothing I've seen that wasn't easily exposed as crap for one reason or another.
