--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
<snip>
> Yes, and speaking of statistics I read somewhere that over 9,000 US 
> soldiers have now died as a result of the Iraq war, though the 
> Pentagon is only counting the 1700 or so who actually died in Iraq. 
> Can anyone confirm or refute this?

Someone at the (very anti-Bush) blog Daily Kos emailed 
icasualties.org, a site that tracks casualties in Iraq, asking about 
the casualties rumor.  He got this email back, which seems to be 
definitive:

-----Original Message-----
From: Patricia D. Kneisler 
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:34 PM
To: Zwissler, Robert-E
Subject: Fw: Iraqi Casualties

Hello, Rob. Michael White just forwarded your message on to me. 

In a word ... NO ... I do not believe such a discrepancy is even 
remotely possible. I hadn't seen the DKos diary, so went there just 
now and scanned through the diary and comments. It never ceases to 
amaze me what otherwise sensible people will fall for.

For two solid years now, Michael White and I have followed the deaths 
in Iraq literally on a daily basis. We haunt the CENTCOM, MNF-Iraq 
and DOD websites ... as well as all of the major news feeds. In fact, 
the two of us have grown adept at finding death notices in the news 
media prior to the military issuing them. For about the past year and 
a half, Michael and I have been joined in the research by Evan D., an 
historian in the Washington D.C. area, and by Lynn L., another 
researcher whose husband is in the 4th ID. So that makes 4 of us 
searching the news media and the military sites, each and every day 
mind you, for deaths.

And after all this time, we all four of us concur. Yes, there are a 
few unreported deaths, which I'll explain in a minute. But not 
thousands. We'd have found them if there were.

Here's something that might interest you. If you go to our homepage, 
you'll notice a place up top that says "Fatality Details". Click on 
that. That'll take you to our fully searchable database.

When you get there, scroll down to the bottom of that page to where 
the Filters are. I'm finding that many people simply don't realize 
these handy, dandy little tools are there. Go over to the right to 
where it says "Country of Death" ... and select, say, "Germany" from 
the drop down list. Then hit the "Apply Filter" button over to the 
left.

Voila ... a list of 23 guys will appear ... all of whom died in 
Germany from wounds or illnesses incurred in Iraq ... all of whom 
have formal releases from the DOD and who are on the DOD's death list.

Now go back to the filters and hit "Remove Filter" so that you can 
start fresh. Go back to the "Country of Death" and select "USA", then 
hit "Apply Filter". There's 31 troops who died in the USA and whom 
the DOD has owned up to.

So there's no truth to the rumor that if you die outside of Iraq, the 
DOD automatically ignores you. Yes, occasionally it does ... 
especially if the death happens months after the soldier gets back 
from Iraq (Lynn's husband knows of 5 men that this applies to). And I 
am told that occasionally Special Forces deaths may be hush-hush. But 
as a rule, no. It's just a wild rumor.

And it's the same with this 7,000 business. If our list were missing 
thousands of names, can you imagine the e-mails we would get from 
enraged grannies, aunts, best friends, etc. for daring to leave their 
loved one OFF !!!!!??? I shudder to think of it. I get called to task 
for every little goof-up I make as it is. I recently mistakenly 
entered a soldier's service branch as "U.S. Army National Guard" 
because that's what a news article said. Oh my ... the chaplain for 
the man's unit had an e-mail in to me within the HOUR complaining 
that it was U.S. ARMY RESERVES, dammit! And then there are the 
parents who write to say that the DOD published the wrong hometown, 
and would I please put the correct one in my database. We have 
thousands upon thousands of eyes out there watching that list. We 
aren't missing thousands of names.

The last thing to consider is this: the Bush administration isn't 
GOOD ENOUGH to hide that many deaths. They haven't managed to hide 
Halliburton's over-runs. They haven't managed to hide the troop 
equipment shortages. And they haven't managed to hide their own 
ineptness in the whole occupation. Somehow the truth has a way of 
seeping out between the cracks.

And me and Michael and Lynn and Evan watch those cracks like hawks.

Oh, dear ... didn't mean to write a diatribe. But this rumor is 
really starting to set my teeth on edge. I think I may send the above 
to Markos and see if he'll publish it ... at least let me get my very 
considered opinion in!

Thanks for the tip on the article. I hope I answered your question.

Pat K.
Researcher, ICCC [Iraq Coalition Casualty Count]






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to