--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ruffedgrousepa" <ruffedgrous...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bill smith ruffedgrousepa@ > wrote: > > > > In posting here , doesn't mean i agree with the views of others who > post here. > > > > When I learned TM as a young school student , the presentation as i > perceived it, was that, even though we where to give flowers and cloth , > the teaching was non religious and the teacher does the puja and we > where not to be involved. I wondered about this, and thought > NO devotion? how cruel is that, so while standing at the paja, the only > exception to this cruelty was that I must be Guru Dev. Is there any > other explanation? > > The question about this promotion to me would be, can the movement > handle more Guru Devs. > > > > And with that being said , it must be added that we do not charge for > the teaching of meditation. > > > > > Having emailed and talked with various tmers and organizers etc.., I > sometimes dont know what to think about what my responsibility should be > , in my hopes for anyone and everyone to enjoy life . I have > found my experience to be so profound, and always looking for ways to > share that. > > Even from the very beginning when the presentation for TM , left me > with a feeling that my gift of flowers was not to be considered part of > the process. Guru Dev was able to except that. through transcendental > experiance. but transcedental experiance can easily be misunderstood > by someone who is not having that same level of experience. > > I dont get replys to my emails, and sometimes i get red-eyed ,and think > it best not to make too much of it.>>
WTF? Does anyone understand what this guy just said? Pleae give a translation. > > Without Maharishi's direct involvement I think it be better not to > charge for the Teaching of Meditation.> WTF? OffWorld
