--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2009, at 3:48 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > * The reading of Rig Veda and the chanting of Sama > > Veda after "flying." What is NOT religious about > > being forced to sit there and listen to hour after > > hour of readings *directly* from the pages of > > scripture? > > According to Judy, if you don't understand > Sanskrit and hence have no idea that you're > reading a religious text, then it isn't religious. > Kind of like, if the president does it, it isn't > illegal. With impeccable logic like that, who > needs fanatics?
BWAHAHAHAHA!! Sal "Impeccable Logician" Sunshine tells us where it's at. Of course, I never said what she claims. What I said was that if you don't understand the language, it isn't religious *to you*. It would be interesting to hear Sal's rebuttal of that. It would also be absolutely fascinating to hear Sal's logical explanation for why *even her misstatement of what I said* bears any resemblance whatsoever to Nixon's statement. We're so lucky to have Sal to pass judgment for us on the quality of logic in the discussions here.
