In a message dated 7/3/05 2:05:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would still  like to see hard
> numbers about civilian casualties in Iraq and what  the extent if
> the casualty was.

The coalition does not keep figures on Iraqi
casualties.  The estimate published in Lancet
is of 100,000 Iraqi *deaths*.

> I would also like to know how many casualties 
> are attributed to
> terrorists resisting the will of the Iraqi people to set up a
> democracy.

Who weren't killing any Iraqis until after the
U.S. invaded and set up its occupation.




Jstien.Do you have any idea where the Lancet gets it's figures from and how they are calculated? Do you or anybody you know of have any idea of the statistics of how many Iraqis have died from terrorists? By the way occupation may be your term but it is incorrect. Occupation would indicate that we control and set policy. Iraq has had an interim government for well over a year now and they make their own policies.


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to