--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  
> In a message dated 7/3/05 2:05:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> I would  still  like to see hard 
> > numbers about civilian casualties in  Iraq and what  the extent 
if 
> > the casualty was.
> 
> The  coalition does not keep figures on Iraqi
> casualties.  The estimate  published in Lancet
> is of 100,000 Iraqi *deaths*.
> 
> > I would also  like to know how many casualties  
> > are attributed to 
> >  terrorists resisting the will of the Iraqi people to set up a 
> >  democracy.
> 
> Who weren't killing any Iraqis until after the
> U.S.  invaded and set up its occupation.
> 
> Jstien.Do you have any idea where the Lancet gets it's figures  
> from and how they are calculated?

Yes.  See the summary below.

> Do you or anybody you know of have any idea of  the 
> statistics of how many Iraqis have died from terrorists?

I don't; I'm sure someone does.

> By the way  occupation may 
> be your term but it is incorrect.

Nope, that's the term the administration uses.

Here's the summary of the study in Lancet:

Background
In March, 2003, military forces, mainly from the USA and the UK, 
invaded Iraq. We did a survey to compare mortality during the period 
of 14·6 months before the invasion with the 17·8 months after it.

Methods
A cluster sample survey was undertaken throughout Iraq during 
September, 2004. 33 clusters of 30 households each were interviewed 
about household composition, births, and deaths since January, 2002. 
In those households reporting deaths, the date, cause, and 
circumstances of violent deaths were recorded. We assessed the 
relative risk of death associated with the 2003 invasion and 
occupation by comparing mortality in the 17·8 months after the 
invasion with the 14·6-month period preceding it.

Findings
The risk of death was estimated to be 2·5-fold (95% CI 1·6–4·2) 
higher after the invasion when compared with the preinvasion period. 
Two-thirds of all violent deaths were reported in one cluster in the 
city of Falluja. If we exclude the Falluja data, the risk of death is 
1·5-fold (1·1–2·3) higher after the invasion. We estimate that 98000 
more deaths than expected (8000–194000) happened after the invasion 
outside of Falluja and far more if the outlier Falluja cluster is 
included. The major causes of death before the invasion were 
myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, and other chronic 
disorders whereas after the invasion violence was the primary cause 
of death. Violent deaths were widespread, reported in 15 of 33 
clusters, and were mainly attributed to coalition forces. Most 
individuals reportedly killed by coalition forces were women and 
children. The risk of death from violence in the period after the 
invasion was 58 times higher (95% CI 8·1–419) than in the period 
before the war.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to