--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: <snip> > Basically, the way I see it, all these TBs > are melting down for two reasons. The first > is because we're talking about sex as if it > were normal to have sex. Many of these people > are so uptight that they don't believe that. > But the second reason is that we are talking > about Maharishi the way we would talk about > any other man on the planet, as if he weren't > in any way "special." We're cutting him no > special breaks for being "holy." > > AND THAT MAKES THEM CRAZY.
Uh, no, doesn't make me crazy, sorry. What *annoys* me is the lengths you and other TM critics will go to in order to find some excuse, no matter how ridiculous and far-fetched, to dump on him. Goodness knows he had plenty of very human faults; there's really no need to make any more up except as a way of venting one's spleen yet again. The fault you're making up here isn't homosexuality; that wouldn't be a fault. What you're doing is making up his purported homosexuality in order to make up the fault of hypocrisy, given his homophobic views. Those views themselves were bad enough. Again, goodness knows he exhibited other hypocrisies. It looks as though you're bored with complaining about his real hypocrisies, so you have to conjure up a new one, on the basis of zero evidence.
