--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > So, the mutterings of a beloved 85-year-old > > I KNOW those funny old people with their "mutterings"! I'm guessing that you > don't hang out with people in their 80's who are with it? > > [at that time] man > > are going to be used to prove what... THat he's 85 and somewhat > > out of touch? > > Well we are talking about a pitchman for FULL human potential here so it > isn't exactly JUST some guy on a park bench. And his "mutterings" were > ironclad policies that affected the lives of many people. Not to mention the > blatant hypocrisy of a guy whose own life was extended by Western medical > doctors acting as if they were witch doctors to avoid at all cost. > > > > > It's already obvious that some of those suggestions have been > > overruled in someway by King Tony or that MMY himself modded > > the system at some point (like gasp, HE never changed his mind > > about something). > > > > L > > The "Aw shucks routing doesn't fly here. Here is a guy who is supposed to be > the embodiment of his own system revealing that it didn't work very well in > increasing his own mental capacity and whose physical state not only reveals > that he was NOT in possession of knowledge worthy of the grandiose claim of > being "the supreme > authorities on health", he falls waaaay short of a man I have witnessed using > the rasayana "Dry Martini" followed by sacred cow in as many forms as he > could find it. Maharishi was in poor health starting in his 70's in a decade > where the martini system produced a man who could still beat me in tennis. > (Not trying to make to much of a point of this since I kinda suck at tennis.) > > I can feel nostalgic for Maharishi too. But that doesn't cloud my vision of > the counter evidence to every claim he made about his system that the end of > his life represented. If Maharishi in his 70's represents the "after" > picture I'm amazed anyone still follows his "supreme" health advice. > > And if he, with his ability to set himself up with the most ideal possible > life conditions according to his own theory couldn't at least give us the > vitality of the average octarian farmer in the Tuscan countryside knocking > back the rocket fuel grappa between bottles of Chianti wine (expect more such > references in the coming weeks) what do you think his system is going to > accomplish for all those whose economic circumstances don't allow for such > perfect compliance to his "ideal" system? (You know, all the non > multi-millionaires)
So the fact that his health failed him is proof that his system doesn't work, period? Lawson
