OK, just as a last point before I write Edg off as too mentally ill to bother to read or reply to, ever, he is *still* continuing on his "Turq is a predator" routine.
Just yesterday, as I remember, as needy as ever, he implored people to "vote" on whether they supported his fantasy of "predation" where I was concerned. I said nothing. Nothing. Several people, however, "voted." I haven't bothered to count, and won't, but as I recall the *only* ones who checked in to support Edg's fantasies were Jim (no surprise there) and Nabby (again, no surprise). I don't even think Willytex supported him. Even Judy said he was being silly. Everyone else essentially told him that he was full of shit. When announcing his little "vote" he claimed he'd be open to reassessing things and even hinted at admitting that he was wrong. I think we now see exactly how good *Edg's* word is, and how "moral" he really is. He still continues his "predator" routine, and will in the future. The man is insane. That is my only explanation for his behavior. Not for the first time, I pity the woman who lives with him, if she exists. She *has* to put up with this level of hypocrisy. I don't; relief is as close as the Delete key. Edg, you are toast as far as I am concerned. Here is one last suggestion for you -- if you want to know what you *really* think of people, and the extent of your narcissism and out-of-control ego, you need look no further than the way you format (or fail to) your posts. Every single one of them is sent using word wrap, which means that for many readers here, including everyone using the Yahoo Web interface, they are nigh unto unreadable. And you don't CARE. The *reason* you don't care about your "readers" is that they aren't *important* to you when you write. That's why you never sell anything. The only thing that is important to you is your own out-of- control ego, and allowing it to vent. Do so all by your lonesome. I will have nothing more to do with you. --- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_re...@...> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Turq's on record here naysaying just about every sort of moral; does > anyone here think he'd pass up hitting on some girl who's, say, > distraught, or, way drunk, or, otherwise momentarily vulnerable? > > > > Yes I'm certain he would pass up hitting on the drunk or distraught. > > Because that is abuse and what Turq is talking about is fun between > > consenting adults. You have to have no respect at all for women to > take advantage like this (it's illegal now too) > > I don't accuse Turq of having ever done so, but that, since he rejects > all notions of moral axioms, if he did maraud a much younger woman, he > can tell us that he'd properly warned us of the possibility and he's > thusly protected by caveat empor. You know, what the scorpian said to > the frog. > > > > Seems to me like there is a lot of sexism in your post Edg, you > > seem to be assuming that women aren't capable of deciding for > themselves who they want to spend the night with and that they > > are easily persuaded otherwise. > > I've plainly said that young men can be as easily predated as young > women. > > The world has moved on from this > > 50's morality of dumb broads waiting for men to flex their biceps > > or open their laptops. > > > > > > > Fuck, walk into any Starbucks and look at the guys with their > laptops. Fucking look at them will ya? Who the fuck goes to a crowded > coffee shop to do serious work? These guys are looking for women. Do > it. Go there and simply look at what the guys do with their eyes. > > > > Guys looking at girls? I'm shocked, truly. How will the > > world survive this outrage. > > What's your point? Do you think I'm saying it's wrong to look at women? > > I am making the points that 1. doing business of merit in a coffee shop > is going to be a rare event, 2. given a lot of foot traffic it is > certain that "the weak ones" will be a significant portion of that > traffic, 3. and that predators can be found in sheep's clothing. > > > > PS I use a copy of The Guardian, does it work better with a > > laptop? >
