I use Yahoo's online "post message" form to compose. This is the first time I ever was notified that this makes for bad HTML formatting for those getting the posts via email.
Are all the rest of you, what?, typing until your sentences get to about ...............here and then hitting the return key?............. I'm using the rich-text Editor for this post, with Georgia font at the "2" setting. Does this come out badly in your emails? My posts have always appeared readable to me using the browser, and for most of the time I don't even go into the rich-text editor. Are ALL my posts coming out badly formatted?...or just about half of them? For someone to think I've been doing this on purpose seems an odd projection given how my reputation here is that of a narcissist seeking approbation. Is that how Turq works it out for himself -- that is, does he devise such methods to bother others but that he can duck any responsibility for by having 100% deny-ability? Sigh, now I'll never know, cuz he's done with me....see him running with his fingers in his ears screaming la la la la? Edg --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > <snip> > > Several people, however, "voted." I haven't bothered > > to count, and won't, but as I recall the *only* ones > > who checked in to support Edg's fantasies were Jim > > (no surprise there) and Nabby (again, no surprise). > > I don't even think Willytex supported him. Even Judy > > said he was being silly. > > Here's what I *actually* said: > > "Incidentally, I wouldn't want to pass judgment on > Edg's emotional health, and I think his 'predator' > kick is kinda silly, but he's just *nailed* Barry's > transparent phoniness in several of his recent posts." > > <snip> > > Edg, you are toast as far as I am concerned. Here > > is one last suggestion for you -- if you want to > > know what you *really* think of people, and the > > extent of your narcissism and out-of-control ego, > > you need look no further than the way you format > > (or fail to) your posts. Every single one of them > > is sent using word wrap, which means that for > > many readers here, including everyone using the > > Yahoo Web interface, they are nigh unto unreadable. > > And you don't CARE. > > Actually, most of his posts are perfectly readable > on the Web site. Some of them have a few runovers, > but that's easily fixable by making the type size > slightly smaller in your browser. > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: > <snip> > > Several people, however, "voted." I haven't bothered > > to count, and won't, but as I recall the *only* ones > > who checked in to support Edg's fantasies were Jim > > (no surprise there) and Nabby (again, no surprise). > > I don't even think Willytex supported him. Even Judy > > said he was being silly. > > Here's what I *actually* said: > > "Incidentally, I wouldn't want to pass judgment on > Edg's emotional health, and I think his 'predator' > kick is kinda silly, but he's just *nailed* Barry's > transparent phoniness in several of his recent posts." > > <snip> > > Edg, you are toast as far as I am concerned. Here > > is one last suggestion for you -- if you want to > > know what you *really* think of people, and the > > extent of your narcissism and out-of-control ego, > > you need look no further than the way you format > > (or fail to) your posts. Every single one of them > > is sent using word wrap, which means that for > > many readers here, including everyone using the > > Yahoo Web interface, they are nigh unto unreadable. > > And you don't CARE. > > Actually, most of his posts are perfectly readable > on the Web site. Some of them have a few runovers, > but that's easily fixable by making the type size > slightly smaller in your browser. >
