--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I think you're right Judy. After reading Williams 
> > post it does jar my mind that what she said was more like She 
> > didn't KNOW he was a Christian simply because he said he was 
> > one, implying that he might be saying that for political 
> > expediency, which I had also thought and perhaps expressed.
> 
> And since Hillary said it, it's an axiom.
>
> Therefore, the next time someone says, "I
> never lie," or "I am not a True Believer,"
> there is no reason to believe them simply
> because they say it about themselves. One
> is free to come to one's own conclusions
> based on their behavior.

Right. Except that what she *actually* said was:

"You know, I take him on the basis of what he
says. And, you know, there isn't any reason to
doubt that....No. No. Why would I? No, there is
nothing to base that on, as far as I know."

Oooooopsie! Exactly the opposite of what Mike
claims she said.

> There are many cases of people following
> the Hillary Axiom on this forum. For example,
> both Vaj and I have said many times that we
> are not Buddhists, even though we have both
> studied Buddhist teachings. And yet Raunchy
> and Nabby and enlightened_dawn11 and others
> continue to refer to us as Buddhists. Clearly
> they believe strongly in the Hillary Axiom.

Clearly Barry believes strongly in the (faux)
Hillary Axiom, since he simply accepts what
Mike says Hillary said without question, even
though the transcript of what she *actually*
said has been posted here many times, including
by me yesterday and again above.





> Hillary rules. 
> 
> Remember Her words (capitalizing Her holy 
> name as Mike did above) and live by them.
> Just because someone says something about
> what he or she believes, it is not necessary
> to believe them.
>


Reply via email to