--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <reavisma...@...> wrote:
>
> Like you, I've only read the few chapters of Coplin's
> dissertation that appear in a google search.  I'd like
> to read the rest, too.
> 
> And these titles, like referring to Guru Dev as "His
> Divinity", all seem to be purely honorific.  I hadn't
> heard about the use of maharishi as a "pathfinder"
> title, but I agree that it's appropriate should that
> be so.

The flip side may be that, as I suggested, it would
indicate he wasn't claiming either an "official"
spiritual rank or to be the successor in a *lineage*
per se. I'd bet such subtleties would be fairly obvious
to Indians familiar with the spiritual-title game.


Reply via email to