--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: > > > On May 31, 2009, at 9:26 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote: > > > "Randy Meltzer" <rm108@> wrote: > > > >> Any comments Vaj? > >> > > > > I have noticed sometimes at this point the call gets dropped. > > > Depends on a number of things really Lurk. A big one for me is 'what > do I perceive as their underlying intention?'. Another is 'is this > just another "pile on" post? I'm not a fan of digital rugby. Do I > have enough time and is it worth it? It's also good to feel people > are interested in responding to the topic, not just shooting off some > obtuse remark. > > For any of these reasons I may decide not to waste my time. > > Randy seems like a guy interested in actually having an intelligent > conversation and he's had some interesting things to share as well.
Thanks Vaj for saying that. I am not here to do the "pile on Vaj" thing. Its just when you make statements like "the shankaracharya order is Vaishnavite" and my experience is soooo the oposite I had to chime in. And yes, I did have a small axe to grind about you as someone pointed out in a previous post, because I felt your comments in the past about my experiences were disrespectful. In any case, its nothing personal. Just trying to keep the facts staight >
