--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> <snip>
> [I wrote:]
> > > And with Palin, we saw it coming
> > > almost *exclusively* from the left.
> >
> > Palin was an idiot. She had no business running for vice
> > president, and McCain was a fool to choose her. If she
> > had been a man with the same capabilities, then I'd be
> > saying "he" was an idiot and McCain was a fool to choose
> > him.
>
> Sure. But that's the point--she had so many negatives
> politically, she wouldn't have been competitive if she
> had been a man. So why did the left (including the usual
> suspects here) feel the need to use sexism against her?
> Criticism of her abilities and lack of experience should
> have been more than enough.
>
When you say, 'The Left', who do you mean on the left?
Who exactly was the big macho sexist, that cost Hillary the election?
The only one I can think of on the left, who is a macho sexist, is her hubby,
Bill, who did 'Blow the Election for Her'...big time!
If you want to blame someone 'On the Left' for costing Hillary the election,
blame Billy Boy!
R.G.
