--- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rf...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > Thanks for reminding me how pointless it is to argue with a loon. > > > > While I do not necessarily disagree with you > > when Robert gets into one of I'm-right-because- > > I-remember-it-from-a-past-life moods, I should > > point out about your statement above that he > > is merely returning the favor. :-) > > > > As you do *every* time the name of Saint Hillary > > comes up, you remind us of the pointlessness of > > trying to discuss her rationally with you. You > > are incapable of doing so. > > It couldn't be more obvious. RD ["Hillary is my > champion"] has a BIG chip on her shoulder and it > badly gives bias to her perceptions of Obama's > situation and efforts.
Someone might wish to ask do.rkflex how he accounts for all the Obama supporters who are saying the same things Raunchy is. > After all, Obama didn't stop people from picking on > poor Hillary - so it's all HIS fault that she lost. Oh, really? Did anybody actually say that, or did do.rkflex just decide it was time for a nice straw man to kick around? > That's why RD and Judy nitpicks him like the right > wing fringe does. Hmm, breaches of civil rights and the Constitution are now just "nitpicks" to do.rkflex because his hero is the one doing the breaching. Funny how important they were back when Bush was president. And as I noted in one of my posts, as might be expected, what the lefties (Obama supporters) are complaining about, the right-wing fringe is very happy with. So no, what Obama's critics on the left are saying is *not* like what the right wing fringe is saying. One wonders about do.rkflex's choice of reading material if he hasn't encountered the very loud outcries among Obama's supporters. I guess he just blocks all that from his alleged mind. > And in spite of the hostile, bitter attacks by > the discontents, Obama's approval has consistently > been in the mid 60% range since he took office. And as I also noted, it's as foolish to counter criticisms of Obama with poll numbers, as if they somehow invalidated all criticism, as it is to claim the fact that somebody praises their boss on national television means they really, really like him (or her). The political naivete on this forum is astonishing. Especially from do.rkflex.
