--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > Thanks for reminding me how pointless it is to argue with a loon. > > While I do not necessarily disagree with you > when Robert gets into one of I'm-right-because- > I-remember-it-from-a-past-life moods, I should > point out about your statement above that he > is merely returning the favor. :-) > > As you do *every* time the name of Saint Hillary > comes up, you remind us of the pointlessness of > trying to discuss her rationally with you. You > are incapable of doing so. >
I have no problem backing up my arguments for or against ANY politician with facts because I pay attention to the news as it is and not as I would like it to be. I always back up my discussions regarding Hillary with facts that NO ONE on this forum has EVER refuted. Come to think of it, when have you ever discussed Hillary with one iota of rationality with me or refuted any factual information I've presented? Nada. Until you do, your allegation that I'm incapable of discussing Hillary rationally, only reflects on your lack of interest in factual information and arguing with me point for point on any issue concerning Obama or Hillary. I don't believe you can or will argue factual information, it's not possible to do from the insular, low information, self-referral loop you find so enjoyable residing in your imaginary catbird seat.
