--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what > > > > I'm saying is if you hold it to be equal to > > > > heterosexual marriage then you should treat gay porn > > > > just as you would hetero porn...and if looking at it > > > > shocks you, well then, good, you may have to rethink > > > > your position. > > > > > > In other words, you're against gay marriage. > > > > > > What in heaven's name does being or not being > > > shocked by porn have to do with supporting gay > > > marriage?? > > > > > > Nobody's saying that if gays are allowed to get > > > married, we all have to look at gay porn. Or, for > > > that matter, even think about what gay people do > > > in bed. > > > > > > Does being in favor of heterosexual marriage mean > > > you have to look at heterosexual porn or think about > > > what other heterosexuals do in bed? (Me, I'd rather > > > *do* it than look at it.) > > > > > > If all you can think about when the topic of gay > > > marriage comes up is what gays do in bed, you've got > > > a *big* problem. > > > > > > And I seem to recall you have quite a fondness for > > > watching lesbian love scenes. Are you suggesting > > > lesbians should be allowed to get married but not > > > gay men? > > > > I'm not saying anyone should or shouldn't get married. > > > > What I'm saying is that we shouldn't have double > > standards. For gay marriage? Then be for polygamy, > > gay polygamy, incest, bestiality, etc. > > In other words, you're against gay marriage. >
I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage, bestiality marriage, and incest marriage in equal measure. Aren't you?
