--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote: > > On Jul 1, 2009, at 2:08 PM, shempmcgurk wrote: > > > Thanks for the excellent graph, Vaj. > > > > There's probably nothing better than this graph to demonstrate that > > there is zero connection between co2 emissions and global warming > > (note paticularly pre-1940). > > shemp, one thing I don't understand... > OK, we all get that you don't think GW > is a reality (or at least that's what you > keep implying, ad nauseum). But why > is it so important to you that others, > particularly others here, agree with you?
I don't know why I give that impression, Sal. I long ago gave up any hope that people would agree with me on this or that I could change minds! > If you're secure in your own knowledge, > and that's good enough for you, why do > you constantly seem to need a group > consensus and validation of your opinion? Virtually everyone that posts here on FFL are expressing a point of view. I express mine on GW. I'm not sure why you feel that this is a search for consensus and validation of my opinion more than any other person's posting. > > I am really interested in knowing, because > to me, at least, the constant attempts > at validation and trying to prove others > "wrong" are somewhat fascinating. Global warming policy has, is, and will continue to kill people...all unnecessariy. My postings on this subject is a way for me to vent my frustration at the killing. > > Sal >
