--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcg...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Richard M" <compost1uk@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine 
> > > <salsunshine@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Jul 1, 2009, at 2:08 PM, shempmcgurk wrote: > 
> > > > > Thanks for the excellent graph, Vaj. > >
> > > > > There's probably nothing better than this graph to 
> > > demonstrate 
> > > that  
> > > > > there is zero connection between co2 emissions and global 
> > > warming  
> > > > > (note paticularly pre-1940). > 
> > > > shemp, one thing I don't understand... > OK, we all get that 
> > > you don't think GW > is a reality (or at least that's what you 
> > > > keep implying, ad nauseum).  But why > is it so important to 
> > > you that others, > particularly others here, agree with you? > 
> > > If you're secure in your own knowledge, > and that's good 
> > > enough for you, why do > you constantly seem to need a group > 
> > > consensus and validation of your opinion? > 
> > > > I am really interested in knowing, because > to me, at least, 
> > > the constant attempts > at validation and trying to prove 
> > > others > "wrong" are somewhat fascinating. > 
> > > > Sal
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Well, for my part...
> > > 
> > > One of the things that I guess interests most people is *why do 
> > > we believe in stuff*? And *why do we get to believe in it so 
> > > vehemently*?
> > > 
> > > For example we have folks here who have been TBs and now "see 
> > > the light" (but now in some cases are just as blinkered as they 
> > > were previously as to why others can't NOT see the light after 
> > > their Damascene conversion out of TB).
> > > 
> > > I think we Schemp types feel that this phenomenon of "TB" is 
> > > manifesting in the global warming/climate change hysteria (as 
> > > we would describe it). And it's darn fascinating IMO.
> > > 
> > > For my part I am prepared to believe there *might* be something 
> > > in the global warming conjecture. Though I think I would bet 
> > > against it. But that's not the point really. What gets my 
> > > attention is the crushing certainty and blinkered mind-set of 
> > > the AGW TBs!
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > You and Shemp are in a small minority.
> >
> 
> 
> Thank you for that compliment.
> 
> So was Da Vinci when he said the Earth was round.
> 
> So was Einstein when he said that time was relative.
>
  

Shemp compares himself to Einstein and Da Vinci ?!?  Good Lord... What a hoot!







Reply via email to