On Jul 4, 2009, at 1:14 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
Why stop there? Why not add in that chronilogically her physiology became that of an 18yr old, and she ran a 26 mile marathon that same year, and went on to compete in an iron women competition. I mean why not.

I don't know if anyone remembers someone named

Marianne ( I think) from Chicago, who was supposed

to have been "cured" of breast cancer through TM,

and then died 6 months later, of the disease.  It would

be funny if it weren't sad.


--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
>
> > A friend sent me this. As I read it I thought of the people on FFL
> > who feel that TM is a watered down, ineffectual technique. You know > > I have my issues with the TM Movement. I agree that the research is
> > cherry-picked for use as a PR tool. Decades of TM practice doesn't
> > necessarily make you an honest, ethical, compassionate person, etc.,
> > etc. But I take issue with fundamentalists on either side of the
> > issue who see the world in black and white. There are many accounts
> > of dramatic transformation with TM, including my own, my mother's
> > and others I have witnessed firsthand. I think that a balanced
> > perspective requires acknowledging these, then throwing in all the
> > crazy stuff, then trying to make sense of it all.
> Ever wonder why all these "miracle" accounts
> are totally unsubstantiated and basically
> unverifiable, Rick? How convenient.
>


Sal

Reply via email to