nablusoss wrote: > Maharishi's genius dictated the commentaries, > Vernon did the english language bit and edited > the Sanskrit. > Well, the Sanskrit used in the Bhagavad Gita has been set for thousands of years, according to Vyasa and Pannini, so there wouldn't be any editing of the Sanskrit. The English translation has been available since at least 1700 A.D. But Marshy's purport is pure Marshy, no doubt about that. I don't think the Marshy needed any help explaining how TM works - he didn't seem to be at a loss for words when I was visiting him. If you read the purport, you'll see that Marshy is saying the same thing over and over, since at least 1954. But if you read other BG commentaries, there's no TM mentioned in them at all. So, in that respect, Marshy's BG is unique.
> Kjell Mortensen printed the first version of > which I have a few white versions, gilded and > covered in silk ment for Dignitaries, and said > they had to dig very deep into the archives of > his family-printing-business to find that > ageold typeface for the Sanskrit.
