--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > <snip> > > So the best solution is to turn the health whole mess to a boobish > > coniving administration and a corrupt, hostage-held congress, > > overseen by an emerging Supreme Court that may overturn or highly > > restrict Roe.V Wade, restrict stem cell research, etc? I'm missng > > something here. > > I don't think anyone is predicting it could happen > under the current administration. If it were ever > to get to the turning-over stage, it would be because > the administration had become less boobish and the > Congress less corrupt to start with. And the Supreme > Court doesn't "oversee" anything; it's purely > reactive. > > Aside from the fact that the administration and > Congress have refused to fund it adequately, the > Veterans Administration shows that government-run > health care *can* function well in this country.
You've got to be kidding. The VA is incredibly inefficient. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
